How to File a Discrimination Complaint With the CRD and EEOC in California: A Step-by-Step Guide

Hispanic worker filing a workplace discrimination complaint with the EEOC with the help of a San Francisco attorney — Liberation Law Group
Quick answer

In California you must file a complaint with the Civil Rights Department (CRD) before you can sue for employment discrimination. This is not optional paperwork: exhausting the administrative process is a jurisdictional prerequisite, and without it a FEHA lawsuit is subject to dismissal no matter how strong the facts are. You have three years from the most recent discriminatory act (Gov. Code § 12960(e)). The fastest route is the online intake form in the California Civil Rights System (CCRS), though you can also file by mail, by phone, or in person. The detail that saves cases: filing the intake form stops the limitations clock, and the formal complaint drafted later relates back to the intake date. Filing with the CRD also files your charge with the federal EEOC automatically, under the work-sharing agreement between the two agencies. If you want to go straight to court, you can request an immediate right-to-sue notice; from the date it issues you have one year to file the civil action.

Jurisdiction: California · Content last reviewed: October 2026 · General information, not legal advice for an individual case.

This guide walks through the procedure, step by step. If what you need is to understand what counts as discrimination and what the law says, that is on our employment discrimination page. Here we assume you already believe you have a case and what you are missing is what to do, in what order, and against which deadlines.

In this guide

  1. Why this step is mandatory
  2. The detail that saves cases: intake stops the clock
  3. The four ways to file
  4. What information to gather first
  5. Dual filing with the EEOC
  6. The three paths after you file
  7. The right-to-sue notice: when to request it immediately
  8. The deadlines, in one place
  9. The mistakes that close cases
  10. Frequently asked questions

1. Why this step is mandatory

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) requires you to exhaust the administrative remedy before going to court. In practical terms: the CRD first, the courthouse second. This is not a bureaucratic formality. It is a jurisdictional prerequisite, and courts dismiss FEHA claims where the administrative complaint was never filed or was filed late.

This surprises most people, and it is the reason to be skeptical of articles saying that in California “you have three years to sue for discrimination.” The three years are for filing with the CRD. The deadline to file in court is a different one, and it starts running afterward.

Gov. Code § 12960(e) and § 12965(c)(1)(D). Section 12960(e) sets three years from the most recent discriminatory act to file a verified complaint with the CRD. That deadline was only one year until AB 9 extended it to three, effective January 1, 2020. Section 12965(c)(1)(D) provides that once the right-to-sue notice issues, you have one year to file the civil action, measured from the date of issuance rather than the day you receive or open it.

2. The detail that saves cases: intake stops the clock

The process involves two distinct documents, and confusing them costs cases. First you file an intake form describing what happened. Then the CRD prepares the verified formal complaint, which is the document served on the employer.

Here is what matters: under California practice, the date that counts for the deadline is the intake form’s date. The formal complaint is drafted later and relates back to the intake date. If your three-year deadline expires in two weeks, filing the intake now protects your right even if the formal complaint is completed months later.

If your deadline is close, file the intake form today, even if you are missing information. An incomplete intake filed on time beats a perfect one filed late. The CRD will follow up to complete the details. An expired deadline cannot be recovered, and it is the single most common reason winnable cases are lost.

3. The four ways to file

  • Online, through the California Civil Rights System (CCRS). This is the fastest route and it is available around the clock. You create an account at ccrs.calcivilrights.ca.gov and submit the intake there. It produces an immediate record of the filing date, which is exactly what you want.
  • By mail, using the intake form printed from the CRD site. If you use mail, send it with delivery confirmation so you have proof of the date.
  • By phone, calling the CRD, where staff take the information from you.
  • In person. In San Francisco the CRD office is at 455 Golden Gate Avenue in the Civic Center, a short walk from the Civic Center BART station.

You do not need an attorney to file the intake, and there is no filing fee. It is worth getting advice before deciding whether to request an immediate right-to-sue notice, because that decision closes off the administrative investigation.

4. What information to gather first

  • The employer’s legal name and address. The legal name, not the trade name: it appears on your pay stubs. If you work through a staffing agency, note both companies.
  • Approximate number of employees. This determines FEHA coverage: five or more for discrimination, and any size for harassment.
  • Dates. Start and end of employment, and the date of the most recent discriminatory act, which is what sets your deadline.
  • The protected characteristic the treatment was based on: race, national origin, sex, gender, pregnancy, age 40 or over, disability, religion, sexual orientation, or another FEHA category.
  • A timeline of events with dates, names, job titles, and the exact words you remember.
  • Whether you reported internally, to whom, when, and what happened next. This may add a retaliation claim.
  • Witness names with personal contact details, not work ones.
  • Documents: reviews, emails, messages, discipline letters, the employee handbook, and your pay stubs.

5. Dual filing with the EEOC

The CRD and the EEOC maintain a work-sharing agreement: a charge filed with either agency is deemed filed with the other. You do not have to go through the process twice.

That agreement has a concrete effect on deadlines. The general federal deadline with the EEOC is 180 days, but in states with an equivalent state agency — California is one — it extends to 300 days. That is still far shorter than the three-year state deadline, and it is the one most often missed.

Why the state route is usually better. FEHA is more protective than federal law in several respects: the deadline is three years rather than 300 days; there is no damages cap, while Title VII limits them to between $50,000 and $300,000 depending on employer size (42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(3)); harassment applies to employers of any size; and Gov. Code § 12923 allows a single incident to support a hostile work environment claim. The EEOC’s San Francisco district office is at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, a block from the CRD.

6. The three paths after you file

Once the intake is filed, the CRD reviews the complaint for completeness and FEHA coverage, and the case can then take one of three paths:

  1. Mediation. The CRD offers a voluntary dispute resolution program. It is free, relatively fast, and does not obligate you to accept anything. If no agreement is reached, the case continues.
  2. Formal investigation. The CRD requests documents from the employer, interviews witnesses, and determines whether there is probable cause. It costs you nothing, but it is slow: investigations typically take 12 to 24 months. If the CRD finds cause, it can attempt conciliation or even litigate the case itself.
  3. Immediate right-to-sue notice. You waive the investigation and get permission to go to court on your own right away.

7. The right-to-sue notice: when to request it immediately

You can request the right-to-sue notice when you file. Where the worker already has counsel and intends to litigate, an immediate notice is typically issued within 30 to 60 days. It is the route used in most cases that end up in court.

Request it immediately when:

  • You already have an attorney and the plan is to litigate.
  • Damages are significant, especially where emotional distress or punitive damages are in play, since the administrative process does not award them.
  • Waiting 12 to 24 months would degrade the evidence or the witnesses.
  • Several claims are joined, for example discrimination together with unpaid wages or Labor Code retaliation.

Do not request it immediately when:

  • You have no attorney and do not plan to retain one. Without the notice, the CRD investigates on your behalf at no cost.
  • The employer is small and early mediation could resolve the matter.
  • Your primary goal is not money but a change in conduct or an official finding.

The most expensive mistake at this stage: requesting the right-to-sue notice and then letting the year lapse. That notice opens a one-year window to file the civil action, measured from the issuance date. If it expires, the FEHA claim is closed for practical purposes, and the three-year deadline under § 12960 no longer helps you. Do not request the notice until you are ready to sue.

8. The deadlines, in one place

  • CRD complaint: three years from the most recent act (Gov. Code § 12960(e)).
  • EEOC charge: 300 days in California, because of the work-sharing agreement.
  • Civil action after the notice: one year from issuance (§ 12965(c)(1)(D)).
  • Issuance of an immediate notice: typically 30 to 60 days from request, where you are represented.
  • CRD investigation: typically 12 to 24 months.
  • Labor Code retaliation (§§ 1102.5, 98.6): generally three years, with no mandatory administrative step.
  • Unpaid wages: three years, four under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17208).

Where several claims exist, each runs on its own clock and the shortest one governs. That is why it is worth identifying every possible claim before filing rather than after.

9. The mistakes that close cases

  • Assuming you can go straight to court. Without the CRD step, a FEHA lawsuit is dismissed.
  • Counting the deadline from the first incident. In a continuing pattern, the clock runs from the most recent act.
  • Requesting the right-to-sue notice too early and letting the one-year window lapse.
  • Describing only the worst incident. The full pattern matters, particularly under § 12923, which rejects the stray-remark doctrine.
  • Leaving out the retaliation. If you were punished after reporting, that is a separate claim and is often worth more than the original one. Under SB 497, an adverse action within 90 days of your complaint presumes retaliation.
  • Naming the employer incorrectly. Use the legal name from your pay stubs, and where an agency was involved, include both companies.
  • Signing a separation agreement without review. It usually releases claims you do not yet know you have.
  • Staying silent because of a confidentiality clause. Under the Silenced No More Act (SB 331, Code Civ. Proc. § 1001 and Gov. Code § 12964.5), an agreement cannot stop you from disclosing the facts underlying a harassment or discrimination claim.

If your deadline is close or you are unsure which path to take, a short consultation resolves it. No cost, no obligation, and regardless of your immigration status.

Call (888) 442-2642 — We speak Spanish

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to file with the CRD before suing for discrimination in California?

Yes, in employment cases. Exhausting the administrative process with the Civil Rights Department is a jurisdictional prerequisite under FEHA, and courts dismiss lawsuits where the administrative complaint was never filed or was filed late. You can request an immediate right-to-sue notice rather than waiting for the investigation, but the filing step itself cannot be skipped.

How long do I have to file the complaint?

Three years from the most recent discriminatory act, under Gov. Code § 12960(e). The deadline was one year until AB 9 extended it to three, effective January 1, 2020. For the federal EEOC, the California deadline is 300 days.

Do I need a lawyer to file with the CRD?

No. You can file the intake form yourself online through the California Civil Rights System, by mail, by phone, or in person, and there is no filing fee. It is worth consulting before deciding whether to request an immediate right-to-sue notice, because that decision closes the administrative investigation and opens a one-year window to sue.

What if my deadline expires this week?

File the intake form immediately, even without all the details. The date that counts for the deadline is the intake date, and the formal complaint drafted afterward relates back to it. An incomplete intake filed on time is worth far more than a complete one filed late.

Do I also have to file with the EEOC?

You do not have to do it twice. The CRD and the EEOC have a work-sharing agreement under which a charge filed with one is deemed filed with the other. That same agreement is what extends the federal deadline from 180 to 300 days in California.

How long does a CRD investigation take?

Typically 12 to 24 months. It is free to you, but slow. Where damages are significant or evidence may degrade, requesting the right-to-sue notice and litigating is usually the better route.

Is California law or federal law better for my claim?

Generally FEHA is more protective. The deadline is three years instead of 300 days, there is no damages cap — Title VII limits them to between $50,000 and $300,000 by employer size — harassment applies to employers of any size, and Gov. Code § 12923 allows a single incident to support a hostile work environment claim.

Does my immigration status affect the process?

No. Civil Code § 3339 provides that immigration status is irrelevant to the availability of employment remedies, and Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co. (2014) 59 Cal.4th 407 confirmed it. If your employer threatens to report you so that you will not file, that threat is a separate violation of Labor Code § 1019, carrying up to $10,000 per threat.

About the author: Arlo Uriarte

Arlo Uriarte is the founder of Liberation Law Group, with more than 20 years representing workers in labor and employment cases across the San Francisco Bay Area. His practice is exclusively on the worker’s side, never employers. The office is at 2760 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Mission District, and the entire team serves clients in Spanish.

This page provides general information about California administrative procedure as of the last review date. It is not legal advice for an individual situation and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Agency procedures and timelines change; always verify on the CRD’s official site before acting. For guidance on your case, consult an attorney licensed in California.


Facebook

Recent News

Contact Us

Call us now!

We are available to answer your questions.

Representing California Workers for Over 20 Years

Liberation Law Group, P.C. has extensive experience fighting for these rights, whether through private and confidential negotiations, or through litigation and trials. We have successfully fought against both large and small tech companies and government entities. And while we never back down from a fight, we also regularly help our clients achieve their goals through less vocal means with greater collaboration when appropriate. We also have experience guiding employees in labor matters such as taking pregnancy or medical leave, requesting reasonable accommodations, or negotiating employment and termination agreements.